FSA 1 Peer Review Due date: 11 September
Peer reviews must be completed before 23:59!
Peer feedback should assess each of the parts according to these criteria:
- Part 1: Mapping Observation
- How well does the assignment translated the author’s research question into the outputs and features of the place included on the map?
- Can you recognize a relation between the research question and the ethnographic details expressed in the map?
- Does the map demonstrate attentive observation of the organization of space?
- Part 2: Participatory Drawing
- The drawing shows that the researcher made a clear effort to communicate with her/his subjects about the place and its related meaning.
- The researcher has tried to understand the ‘mental map’ of the participant as shown in the details of the participatory map (e.g. daily trajectory/ies).
- Did your peer succeeded in acquiring more insight in the ‘vision’ of the participant?
- Part 3: Drawing from Memory
- What did his/her image enable you to learn about the place, particularly insights that are distinct from the maps?
- How does the researcher reflect on the experience of drawing as a tool of remembrance?
- How well does the visualization function as a tool for recollection of sensorial details and the researcher’s embodied knowledge of the place?
- Part 4: A View from the Archive/Database
- Have the selected maps any relevance to historical developments that affected the place?
- How well has the researcher explored the impact of time and historical events on the organization and meaning of your research site?
- Give your views on if you think your peer has exhausted the possibilities of gaining insight in the historical dimensions of his/her research-site via archival research of maps?